The investigational drugs that weren’t.

Preview of post under construction

NehmingNehms posted links to Steve Bannon’s recent interviews with Naomi Wolf at Gab recently, with a comment:

Naomi Wolf on @BannonWarRoom discusses the horrifying picture that is emerging from analysis of the Pfizer document dump, one of corruption, negligence, greed, and outright inhumanity. A must watch.

NehmingNehms tagged Arkmedic, who is one of the Substack writers (along with Charles Rixey, Dan Sirotkin, Igor Chudov and a few others) tracking down the scientific evidence that Covid was made in a lab, who published a comprehensive piece on April 10.

Arkmedic posted a comment to the Bannon/Wolf links:

They are missing the important bit. That is, that 97% of the patients are missing from the Clinical Record Forms (CRFs) files released in the first document dump. This is the clincher. So many people don't understand what it means but you have to.

There are only 10-15 patients in the clinical record forms (CRFs) for each of the four sites' forms released as part of the court orders [in Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. FDA]. Each site should have around 300 patients, because that is the number in the recruitment log.

They are NOT in a later dump because the court order was for the four biggest sites CRFs to be released first, which they did.

---

From my standpoint as someone trying to find and understand the legal frameworks that provide additional evidence that Covid was made in a lab, for global, government-funded, government-run bioterrorist purposes, I posted a question to Arkmedic:

Can you clarify your interpretation of this bit?

I’m working on a synopsis of the many legal frameworks constructed to make the government-corporation Covid plan work, and they all seem to converge on one provision of EUA law: 21 USC 360bbb-3(k), such that EUA covered countermeasure products, once designated as such by HHS (March 10, 2020, retroactive to February 4, 2020, which was the same day that WHO provided the Pierre Gsell “list of candidate vaccines” to governments and researchers) are legally not part of any “clinical investigation,” despite the fact that the so-called Phase 3 clinical trials will not be finished for two years at the earliest.

Many other legal facts derive from this: there are no clinical trials, no investigational drugs or experimental treatments, no human subjects or patients, no informed consent requirements, no supervising doctors, no data collection and analysis, no prescriptions, no doctor-patient relationships subject to Hippocratic Oath, no Institutional Review Boards, no civil or criminal liability, no safety or efficacy benchmarks, no stopping conditions, no quality control or manufacturing standards or inspections, no product labeling requirements, no marketing standards, no clinical trial fraud, no requirement to produce a pure/unadulterated product.

At the end of the day, under legal definitions, nothing has been done, and no one has done anything, to anyone.

And the recursive loop can be infinite, as covered countermeasures are developed and deployed, and authorized, through EUA, as treatments for complications from previously developed and deployed covered countermeasures.

I think this fits with what you’re saying about 97% of patients missing from files.

Working on a full post about this with links to the statute citations.

---

St. Perpetua and St. Felicitas, patron saints of mothers and expectant mothers.