Spike protein, furin cleavage site, gp120, HIV, microvascular destruction, turbo-cancer and cystic fibrosis
Geopolitical, legislative, executive and DOD context for Walter M. Chesnut’s SPED hypothesis. UPDATED with more DOD prototype ownership information.
Comment posted there, revised and expanded here:
There was a cystic fibrosis expert on the 2015 Menachery/Baric team that designed SARS-CoV-2, with NIH/NIAID/US-AID and Chinese funding, for maximum transmissibility and lethality: SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Pose Threat for Human Emergence, Nature Medicine.
Biological weapons expert Francis A. Boyle calls the paper the smoking gun that should be the cornerstone of criminal prosecutions, in his legal strategy proposal for ordinary men and women to find and embolden county prosecutors with integrity to file criminal murder and conspiracy to murder charges under 18 USC 1111 and 18 USC 1117.
Such prosecutors have proven elusive, in red counties as much as blue.
They’re not naive.
They refuse to look at the evidence, open investigations and file charges.
Consider running for District Attorney in your county during the next opportunity, and make county-level criminal prosecution of the Covid cull architects a cornerstone of your campaign.
In the meantime, find some likeminded people in your county and make an appointment to go talk to your county prosecutor at his or her office about the evidence and your interest in investigations.
Plan to go a couple of times a month for the foreseeable future.
The dam is going to break, but only if the water pressure keeps rising.
Among the authors of the smoking gun Menachery paper were Scott Randell of the UNC-Chapel Hill Department of Cell Biology and Physiology and Cystic Fibrosis Center, Marsico Lung Institute and Wayne A Marasco, Harvard Medical School Department of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine
Human airway epithelial cultures were supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease of the NIH under award NIH DK065988.
Roots of the program that led to SARS-CoV-2 lie in a sequence of globalist, Presidential and Congressional acts initiated in 1969 to authorize US Department of Defense chemical and biological weapons experiments on soldiers and prisoners (and by 1997, authorize DOD chemical and biological weapons attacks on the general public); set up the Special Virus Program within the National Cancer Institute at the NIH; and establish global depopulation as a core globalist-banker-driven, American-led, geopolitical strategy.
The geo-strategists were led publicly by National Security Advisor and then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, with Anthony Fauci taking the lead on the scientific side as he arrived at NIH in 1968.
Kissinger, Fauci and their co-conspirators sought to find or lab-develop a communicable virus that could cause or accelerate cancer and otherwise shorten lives, that could be released and circulated quietly, with maximum plausible deniability and minimum public political and immunological resistance.
Starting in 1976, swine flu and HIV were among the first successful deployments.
SARS-CoV-2 is the most recent, societally-debilitating and deadly in the sequence so far.
Nixon, Ford, Carter Administrations:
1969/06/09 - Dr. Donald MacArthur testified to US Senate hearing on DOD appropriations, about development of “new infective microorganisms which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.”
1969/11/19 - Congress and President Nixon passed Armed Forces Appropriations Act. PL 91-121, 83 Stat. 209. Section 409 authorized Department of Defense to use human subjects for experiments in chemical and biological weapons, established reporting requirements (DOD reports to Congress) codified at 50 USC 1511(a) and authorized President to suspend informed consent and other provisions during a declared war or national emergency, codified at 50 USC 1515. Congressional reporting requirements amended 1977 and 1982, repealed 1996.
1969/11/25 - President Nixon Statement on Chemical and Biological Defense Policies and Programs
1970 - Globalists, through Club of Rome, published The Predicament of Mankind: Quest for Structured Responses to Growing World-wide Complexities and Uncertainties, A Proposal
1970 - Zbigniew Brzezinski published Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technotronic Era.
1970/03/16 - Congress and President Nixon passed An Act to Establish a Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. PL 91-213, 84 Stat. 67.
1971/08 - US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute published Special Virus Program, Progress Report 8
1971/12/23 - US Congress and President Nixon passed National Cancer Act. PL 92-216, 85 Stat. 778. Expanded US government bioweapons development and programs under pretext of cancer research.
1972 - Globalists, through Club of Rome, published Limits to Growth, expanding on 1970 proposals in Predicament of Mankind.
1972 - Globalists, through Bulletin of the World Health Organization, published two-part series on Virus-associated immunopathology: animal models and implications for human disease, Part 1 and Part 2, addressing potential of lab-developed viral, communicable bioweapons to cause cancers and other life-limiting autoimmune and immune dysregulation disorders.
1972/04/10 - Globalists opened UN Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction for signing, leaving major loopholes for biological and toxic agents allegedly developed for ‘protective’ or ‘prophylactic’ purposes.
1972/08 - US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute published Special Virus Program, Progress Report 9
1974/04/24 - Secretary of State Henry Kissinger promulgated National Security Study Memorandum 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. NSSM 200 directed Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Agriculture, CIA Director, Deputy Secretary of State and Administrator for US Agency for International Development to study international political and economic implications of population growth and offer possible courses of action for the U.S.
1974/12/10 - Secretary of State Henry Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) study completed as the Kissinger Report, establishing global depopulation as US geopolitical strategy.
1975/11/26 - President Gerald Ford endorsed the Kissinger Report’s depopulation plan through National Security Decision Memorandum 314
1976/01 - Swine influenza/H1N1 outbreak started at Fort Dix; in April, Congress funded a vaccine development/mass vaccination campaign through Merck; in late September injections began. Heart attacks, Guillain-Barre syndrome, deaths and other adverse effects resulted. In December, campaign suspended and never restarted.
1976/09/14 - Congress and President Ford passed National Emergencies Act - PL 94-412, 90 Stat. 1255. Codified at 50 USC 34. This is one of the key laws cited in George W. Bush’s Sept. 14, 2001 Proclamation 7463, Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks and renewed every year since, most recently by Biden in Sept. 2021. It’s also one of the laws cited in Donald Trump’s March 13, 2020 Proclamation 9994, Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19) Outbreak, renewed every year since, most recently by Biden in Feb. 2022.
Highly recommend watching this one-hour interview of Attorney Warner Mendenhall and pharmaceutical regulatory expert Sasha Latypova, conducted by investigative journalist Christine Dolan.
Mendenhall represents whistleblower Brook Jackson in her case against Pfizer related to Pfizer/FDA/DOD clinical trial fraud and US government contract fraud.
To which Pfizer has responded that the ‘vaccines’ are not pharmaceutical products subject to transparency, consumer protections and FDA regulation, but are instead bioweapons produced under contract subject to DOD control only.
Latypova investigates and compiles detailed data — working with a team of other data analysts — to document the pharmaceutical corporations’ complete deviance from standard FDA protocols for clinical trials, manufacturing, serialization, labeling, distribution, storage and other supply chain phases.
Which makes sense once you understand that the companies and their subcontractors are producing weapons to sicken and kill people, not medicines to protect and heal people.
Among other things, I learned from the interview that by contract, the contents of the vials are legally under complete DOD control from the start of the raw materials and manufacturing chain, right up until the moment the product is injected into a human arm. (See video at approximately 36:00-38:00).
Sage Hana comment: So are all the vaccine manufacturers selected under DOD control or just Pfizer?
KW reply: I believe it’s all of them. Sasha and her team are working their way through the vaxx contracts posted here. BTW, they could use help in that project, if any readers want to help and have the careful reading skills and time to do so. There are primary contracts and subcontracts, but all seem to lead back to DOD at the top. I don’t yet have the specific citation to the contract(s) Sasha mentioned in the Christine Dolan interview, but will check with her by email about it today.
KW follow-up reply:
Checked with Sasha. Turns out Warner Mendenhall was the source of that statement during the interview, so I will check with him asking for the contract citations.
Sasha has a new report out at TrialSite News.
Sasha’s clarifications in response to my question: “If you have time, could you send me the source of your statement that DOD owns the products and controls them from start of manufacture to point of injection?”
“The sources are
1) DOD contracts. They specify delivery to the DOD of all doses, which is not typical for pharmaceutical products. The pharm products must be serialized and distributed through licensed regulated pharmaceutical distributors. If DOD wants to buy some for the military, ok, but why are they buying 100% of the supply?
2) that DOD maintains ownership through to the injection is Warner Mendenhall's statement. I trust him on that, and also it is corroborated by everything I anecdotally know regarding the control of the vials, preventing people from getting access to them, threats, etc.
In a regular drug or device situation, once it's "approved," any licensed professional can order them from distributors and do an independent study.
These injections are not serialized and not available through pharma distribution chain, so the only entity we know that holds them is the DOD.
When a hospital pharmacy orders drugs from distributors, they take possession, and then are responsible for maintaining regulatory compliance per their pharmacy license. The vax centers/hospitals/pharmacies do not buy the injections (so cannot take possession/oversight), they just "administer" them so again, last known purchaser is the DOD.”
Repost of Mendenhall’s September 5 report:
“Hundreds of millions of people have now been subjected to a “prototype” project by the Department of Defense under its Other Transactional Authority. The prototype project includes invention, production, supply chain mechanisms, and injection planning and performance.
The shots are government property until injected. Be careful if you disrupt delivery:
Diversion of COVID-19 Vaccines Prohibited (updated 06/11/2021). (expand the links to find this wording, or print.) At this time, all COVID-19 vaccine in the United States has been purchased by the United States Government for administration exclusively through the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program. The vaccine and all related ancillary supplies, including the COVID-19 Vaccination Cards, remains U.S. government property until vaccine is administered to the recipient. Inherent in the reference to COVID-19 vaccine remaining property of the United States Government, all USG furnished ancillary materials, including COVID-19 Vaccination Record Cards, have remained property of the United States Government for exclusive use in the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program since the program’s inception. This includes COVID-19 Vaccination Record Cards that have been printed by agents on behalf of CDC, including the jurisdictions. USG-provided COVID-19 Vaccination Record Cards remain property of the United States Government until provided to the vaccine recipient following vaccination through the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program. The COVID-19 Vaccination Record Cards may not be reproduced by anyone other than authorized jurisdictions or without written permission of CDC. Any use or unauthorized reproduction of the COVID-19 Vaccination Cards outside of the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program, or production or use of similar facsimiles of such cards, is prohibited. Any such unauthorized production or use constitutes fraud and is subject to criminal or civil prosecution for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, 42 U.S.C. § 1320b-10, or other relevant federal statutes. COVID-19 vaccination providers are prohibited from selling USG-purchased COVID-19 vaccine (and ancillary materials purchased by the USG for use in the Vaccination Program), soliciting or receiving any inducement, whether direct or indirect, for vaccinating (or providing COVID-19 vaccine to be used for vaccinating) any individual who is not currently eligible to receive COVID-19 vaccine as a member of a group currently authorized under prioritization specified by HHS/CDC/ACIP, the state/territory’s governor or other relevant public health authority, or otherwise diverting COVID-19 vaccine from the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program. Such use constitutes fraud and is a violation of the terms of the provider agreement. It shall be cause for immediate termination from the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program and criminal or civil prosecution for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 or other relevant federal statutes.
To be compliant with Armed Forces Research Project rules, the project team must ensure that:
The project includes a prototype per the statute and the transaction will: “carry out prototype projects that are directly relevant to enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the armed forces;”
As government property, theft, conversion, and disposal of the injection vials may subject people to criminal penalties. Under 18 U.S. Code § 641 it is a crime to embezzle, steal, convert, or dispose of any thing of value issued by a department of the United States government for personal use. It is also a crime to receive, conceal, or retain anything of value if you know it has been embezzled, stolen or converted.
It may seem silly but even masks provided by the U.S. Government fall under this:
Masks provided through this initiative are U.S. government property and remain U.S. government property until received by the individual who intends to wear the mask. Any sale, diversion, or other distribution of these masks for payment, whether direct or indirect, is prohibited and may be subject to civil or criminal prosecution.