More on the International Health Regulations
Bipartisan Presidential Executive Orders in 2003, 2005, and 2014 authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services to detain Americans on suspicion of having colds and flus.
Third installment of the Callender Interview series.
Jan. 31, 2022 - Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally. Set in motion by Bank of International Settlements in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, implemented in 2020 with “WHO-declared pandemic.”
The governments of nation-states around the world can’t stop the mass murder and mass maiming of the world’s people through
forced detentions (in homes, nursing homes, schools, hospitals and quarantine-facilities); forced masking and social distancing;
forced withholding of preventative and early treatments for Covid-19;
forced administration of ventilation, Remdesivir, midazolam and other lethal poisons; and
forced administration of mRNA and DNA bioweapon injections,
until those governments and their central banks (the Federal Reserve in the United States) are prepared to forego access to the international financial system controlled by the individuals who control the Bank of International Settlements.
One step would be signing of a Presidential Executive Order revoking Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003; Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, and Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014, and reinstating Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983.
2005 - World Health Organization creates International Health Regulations
In 2005, through the World Health Organization, the individuals who control the Bank of International Settlements created the International Health Regulations (IHR).
The second edition of the IHR is described, by WHO, as follows:
"In response to the exponential increase in international travel and trade, and emergence and reemergence of international disease threats and other health risks, 196 countries across the globe have agreed to implement the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR). This binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”
The stated purpose and scope of the IHR are "to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade."
The IHR "are not limited to specific diseases, but are applicable to health risks, irrespective of their origin or source."
The IHR further, "require States to strengthen core surveillance and response capacities at the primary, intermediate and national level, as well as at designated international ports, airports and ground crossings. They further introduce a series of health documents, including ship sanitation certificates and an international certificate of vaccination or prophylaxis for travelers."
The 2005 International Health Regulations required each signatory nation to adopt implementing legislation, which the United States government did, through revisions to 42 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 70 and 71.
Those federal laws regulate interstate and foreign quarantine activites during "public health emergencies of international concern."
2017 - Major rulemaking by US Department of Health and Human Services
The most recent, major revisions of 42 CFR Parts 70 and 71 occurred through a "final rulemaking" by the Department of Health and Human Services, published in the Federal Register on Jan. 19, 2017 and effective Feb. 17, 2017. (See 6890 Federal Register. Vol. 82, No. 12)
The Federal Register entry reported that some commenters, during the public comment period, requested clarification concerning whether the World Health Organization’s (WHO) declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) could continue to serve as the basis for a ‘‘public health emergency’’ if the President or HHS Secretary disagreed with the declaration of a PHEIC on legal, epidemiologic, or policy grounds.
Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control respondents described such a scenario as “unlikely” and noted that “CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”
Another comment addressed the same concern from a slightly different perspective: the commenter “objected to referencing the WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in the definition of ‘‘public health emergency’’ because this ostensibly relinquishes U.S. sovereignty.”
Again, HHS/CDC respondents said they “disagreed” with the characterization, stating that US government officials would "give consideration to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC" but would “continue to make its own independent decisions regarding when a quarantinable communicable disease may be likely to cause a public health emergency if transmitted to other individuals.”
A few paragraphs later, the HHS/CDC respondents again said that “it would be unlikely for the United States to formally object to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC, but that CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”
It’s very careful sophistry. HHS states that the US government is unlikely to even try to resist a WHO declaration, not addressing what would happen in that unlikely event of such an attempt. Presumably because it would be financially impossible for the US government to make the attempt, because the Federal Reserve would immediately lose access to the Bank of International Settlements.
Other commenters expressed concern that "any disease considered to be a public health emergency may qualify it as quarantinable" and noted that some PHEICs ‘‘most certainly do not qualify as public health emergencies’’ under the proposed definition.
HHS/CDC respondent's “clarified” that “only those communicable diseases listed by Executive Order of the President may qualify as quarantinable communicable diseases. For example, Zika virus infection, which although the current epidemic was declared a PHEIC by WHO, is not a quarantinable communicable disease.”
After dispatching with the comments, the HHS/CDC respondents concluded: “The definition of Public health emergency is finalized as proposed.”
US Presidents’ Executive Orders since 1990
As it happens, there have been three Executive Orders issued by US Presidents related to the quarantine power of the Secretary of Health and Human Services laws since 1990.
They were promulgated under section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264(b)), and they assigned the President's executive authority to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for implementation.
Executive Order 13295
On April 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13295, listing:
“(a) Cholera; Diphtheria; infectious Tuberculosis; Plague; Smallpox; Yellow Fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American, and others not yet isolated or named) and
(b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route, and, if spread in the population, would have severe public health consequences.” See Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 68, p. 17255
The 2003 Executive Order revoked Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983, which specified quarantinable diseases as including "Cholera or suspected Cholera, Diphtheria, infectious Tuberculosis, Plague, suspected Smallpox, Yellow Fever, and suspected Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Congo-Crimean, and others not yet isolated or named).”
In other words, in 2003, President Bush added the common cold to the list of communicable diseases empowering the executive branch, through the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to summarily detain American citizens and prevent them from travelling across state or federal borders.
Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005
On April 1, 2005, President Bush signed Executive Order 13375, extending the quarantine power of the Health and Human Services Secretary to include:
“(c) Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.’’ (See Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 64, p. 17299)
In 2005, the executive branch of the federal government granted itself the power to detain American citizens for the flu.
Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014
On July 31, 2014, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13674, revising Section b of President Bush's 2003 order. The new text expanded on the definition of SARS [the common cold]:
“(b) Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza.’’ See Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 151, p. 45671
Parsed, in 2014, the federal government expanded its power to detain American citizens for common colds, not only if the diseases are "transmitted" but if they are "capable of being transmitted...and are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic."
That's what made it legally possible for President Trump and President Biden, working through the Centers for Disease Control, to 1) place all Americans — including healthy Americans with no symptoms — under house/business/school arrest; 2) order that healthy Americans wear medical devices (cloth masks) without individual clinical diagnoses, without evidence of efficacy for infection control, and without a personal physician's prescription; and 3) submit to forcible injection of mRNA and DNA toxins.
Combined effect of International Health Regulations and implementing national regulations and executive orders
Explaining the combined effect in the podcast interview, Attorney Todd Callender stated:
“It allows for, in every instance, a suspension of your human rights, your sovereign rights, your Constitutional rights, charter rights.”