Legalized bioterrorism: poisons and antidotes
Starting at NehmingNehms on Gab, I skimmed through a few threads posted in the last few days, documenting how far back the scientific research, by the same evil team of anti-humanists, on the gp120 HIV insert goes.
Some of the threads:
Reading them reminded me of a related piece of evidence coming into view, on the legal side, found in reading through the many Congressional statutes and implementing Health and Human Services regulations adopted, mostly since 2000, on the bioterrorism front, from the 1983 law that first set up the Public Health Emergency framework under the 1944 Public Health Service Act, through the 2000 Public Health Improvement Act (which expanded HHS Secretary’s emergency powers almost a year before the anthrax attacks) to the 2020 CARES Act and bills under review now to update the 2016 Cures Act. (HR 6000; full draft; summary)
There are a lot of them.
But a repeated phrase that keeps coming up is the definition of ‘covered countermeasure’ or ‘qualified pandemic or epidemic product’ to include both:
“i. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic; or to limit the harm such pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause;
OR
ii. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in clause (i).”
See, for example, 42 USC 247d-6d(i)(7)(A), adopted in the PREP Act of 2005.
Every time I see it, I note in the margins “poison and antidote.”
If I’m understanding the threads on the gp-120 sequences and fusion peptides correctly, their scientific analysis is related to this legal framework: the same team of people designed the poisons and the antidotes, mandated and distributed the poisons and are preparing now to roll out the antidotes, as an expansion of the control-profit-enslave-kill paradigm.
Countermeasures for countermeasures, ad infinitum.
I've read all of the text of the CARES Act updates, and [obviously] the background info related to peptide fusion inhibitors. There's not a chance in Hades that the EUA will protect the government in the case of fraud; whether or not the government can pull the manufacturers into the mix depends on how the fraud is adjudicated.
The fact that peptide inhibitors were amongst the prophylactics/therapeutics completely ignored as part of the US research response is hard to dismiss, given that the WIV & Gallaher were both explicitly listing that potential pathway; it's impossible that the NIAID - with Baric and Denison and Graham, etc. - didn't think of them. Baric and Denison and even Fauci discussed them in the years leading up to the pandemic.
The only way the US government can avoid liability is by - you guessed it - successfully censoring the discussion, which is obviously why we cannot allow that to happen