Comment posted to Tess Lawrie’s Substack about WHO pandemic treaty negotiations
I wholeheartedly, full-throatedly support the worldwide effort to block the WHO’s current ‘pandemic treaty’ power grab.
But I have also been trying to raise awareness that I think they already completed the takeover of national sovereignty through silent, automatic provisions of the 2005 WHO International Health Regulations as implemented by federal statutes and regulations adopted in compliance with the IHR provisions.
In other words, Xavier Becerra is currently the dictator of America, the U.S. Constitution is currently suspended, the U.S. president, Congress and courts are currently moot, and the U.S. public health and law enforcement systems have been merged.
And all of those things have been true since January 30, 2020 when Tedros issued the declaration of PHEIC (public health emergency of international concern) and US Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar pulled the automatic, silent, statutorily-authorized trigger for the power transfer from the three branches of government into his unelected hands, on Jan. 31, 2020.
They just haven’t announced the takeover to the public, pretend that those mechanisms are still functioning and put on public performances as if those mechanisms still function.
I first started putting the pieces together after hearing Attorney Todd Callender’s podcast interview on Jan. 30, 2022, and then researched his claims, located the statutes, regulations and court cases, and wrote up a long report about how the silent takeover was built piece by piece, tested and refined and strengthened through Anthrax (2001), SARS (2003), Hurricane Katrina (2005), H1N1 (2009) and other events, and fully deployed for the first time with SARS-CoV-2.
In other words, WHO has been de facto running the governments of the formerly sovereign nation-states since January 2020, through each country’s highest public health official.
I continue digging and reporting on these legal frameworks.
And urge people to not just lift up your voices against the WHO’s current attempt to expand and strengthen its powers, but also prepare to engage in sustained, well-informed civil disobedience against the illegitimate laws already on the books.
Those laws have been enforced through psychological, social, economic, behavioral and media control over the last two years, but they are already enforceable through guns, soldiers, police and detention camps at any time Becerra decides to add those physical-force tools to the behavioral tools already deployed.
1983 Public Health Service Act Amendment (added new Section 319, “Public Health Emergencies,” and established $30 million Public Health Emergency Fund)
1986 Childhood Vaccine Compensation Act (exempted pharmaceutical product manufacturers from tort liability for injury and death, established federal taxpayer-funded compensation scheme)
1988 Health Omnibus Programs Act (increased Public Health Emergency Fund to $45 million)
1992 Preventative Health Amendments (changed name of Centers for Disease Control to Center for Disease Control and Prevention)
2000 Public Health Improvement Act (expanded authorities granted to Secretary of Health and Human Services under Section 319, Public Health Emergencies)
2002 Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act (used predicate of anthrax attacks to begin merging public health system with law enforcement system, to create a legal cage to control American people.)
2002 Homeland Security Act
2004 Project Bioshield Act
2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act
2006 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act
2007 John Warner Defense Authorization Act (amended 10 USC 333 re: “insurrection.”)
2012 National Defense Authorization Act (authorized indefinite detention of US citizens without charge or trial)
2013 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act
2016 21st Century Cures Act
2019 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act
2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
Reply posted to a comment by Margaret Anna Alice at Jessica Rose’s Substack: We have less than 24 hours to stop this insane ‘treaty’ from steamrolling us.
I’ve been trying to figure out the timeline for the drafting and adoption too, since reading Astrid Stuckelberger’s view that WHO and its backers are aiming to have the whole thing done by May 2022, even though the official EU and WHO press releases talk about drafting, and then reviews, and then adoption at the 2024 World Health Assembly meeting.
I think they’re going to claim another global emergency to trigger sections of the WHO Constitution (Articles 19-22) that bypass the normal WHA procedures in an emergency and make it so that new regulations enter force once 2/3 of WHA member-state representatives vote for the draft, and are binding on countries that don’t vote or vote no, so long as WHO provides those countries with notice:
Article 19 -The Health Assembly shall have authority to adopt conventions or agreements with respect to any matter within the competence of the Organization. A two-thirds vote of the Health Assembly shall be required for the adoption of such conventions or agreements, which shall come into force for each Member when accepted by it in accordance with its constitutional processes.
Article 20 - Each Member undertakes that it will, within eighteen months after the adoption by the Health Assembly of a convention or agreement, take action relative to the acceptance of such convention or agreement. Each Member shall notify the Director-General of the action taken, and if it does not accept such convention or agreement within the time limit, it will furnish a statement of the reasons for non-acceptance. In case of acceptance, each Member agrees to make an annual report to the Director-General in accord- ance with Chapter XIV.
Article 21 - The Health Assembly shall have authority to adopt regulations concerning: (a) sanitary and quarantine requirements and other procedures designed to prevent the international spread of disease [mandates and detentions]; (b) nomenclatures with respect to diseases, causes of death and public health practices [how pandemic, vaccine, cause of death, herd immunity and other terms are defined under law]; (c) standards with respect to diagnostic procedures for international use [PCR tests]; (d) standards with respect to the safety, purity and potency of biological, pharmaceutical and similar products moving in international commerce [product manufacturing standards]; (e) advertising and labelling of biological, pharmaceutical and similar products moving in international commerce.
Article 22 - Regulations adopted pursuant to Article 21 shall come into force for all Members after due notice has been given of their adoption by the Health Assembly except for such Members as may notify the Director-General of rejection or reservations within the period stated in the notice.
As I understand Stuckelberger’s analysis, the US government’s original vote to join WHO — which I think probably happened in the late 1940s or early 1950s, but haven’t tracked it down, means that, so long as US stays a member, its consent is implied/built in to any votes that take place under the terms of the WHO Constitution, so long as WHO notifies the US government of the regulations, and so long as the US didn’t take active steps to state objections.
The US government appears to be leading the charge on the pandemic treaty, as James Roguski has reported, so it won’t be sending objection notices, as Russia apparently already has (again, according to Stuckelberger).