Are vaccines biological and chemical weapons? By physical composition and physiological effects, yes. Under deceitful American and international law, no.
Part 1 of series.
JMJ
Orientation for new readers; American Domestic Bioterrorism Program; Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law
Note Sept. 12, 2025 - I’ve removed some of the content from this post, because I finished writing the memo into which those parts have been incorporated.
St. Benedict Memo - Documentation of relevant developments in relevant US federal laws.
International and federal biological agent and toxin laws and facilities, including "biosafety lab" (BSL) and "biological select agent and toxin" (BSAT) regulations are theatrical props to support projected illusion of stable, self-spreading biological threats.
Just as international and federal biological product laws and facilities are theatrical props to support projected illusion of vaccine design and manufacturing quality control for protective, prophylactic, defensive or peaceful purposes.
Katherine Watt, September 2022
In October 1998, Congress and President Clinton passed the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act.
[One section] established the National Pharmaceutical Stockpile, later renamed the Strategic National Stockpile, and appropriated $51 million (regularly topped up in subsequent appropriations) “to remain available until expended…for pharmaceutical and vaccine stockpiling activities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."
[Another section] of the same 1998 bill — the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998 — established prohibitions on chemical weapons, to give the appearance of US compliance with the terms of the 1997 UN Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction.
The 1998 dual-use legislation accomplished another key US Government objective: it rendered the DOD’s illegal stockpile of biological and chemical agents into a ‘legal’ stockpile of pharmaceutical products and vaccines.
Same deadly toxins.
Different labels.
Katherine Watt, January 2023:
…they needed to build in loopholes and the loopholes they built in were that, ‘We're not going to do biological and chemical research and weapons development except for protective or prophylactic or defensive purposes.’ And that's a false characterization because all biologically active products are intrinsically aggressive and toxic and lethal… that's the thing that disciplines like toxicology, pharmacokinetics, genotoxicity, drug-drug interactions, are all related to that fact: that everything that goes into the human body or any living body has some effects which can be toxic.
Sasha Latypova, September 2024
Charles Richet (Anaphylaxis, 1913) demonstrated that anaphylaxis is anything from mild rash to shock. And it has the same underlying mechanism. Now, later on the science has demonstrated, well, there are different antibodies and different things that happen with mild versus not mild, but the outcome is the same. The body gets sensitized by injection to whatever was injected and the injection specifically of proteins. It does not have to be toxic at all or considered toxic.
As long as you inject protein directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive tract, that sets up the state of anaphylaxis. By ingesting proteins [through the digestive tract], we can ingest almost anything....Our digestive tract deals with proteins extremely well. It disassembles them and then we reassemble our own.
Now, when you inject foreign protein, our entire system is designed in such a way that we reject non-self proteins. And so anything, even what you think is benign, like milk, will become poisonous and can kill somebody...
What [Richet] found...working on these early attempts at vaccinations [is] that it's unpredictable which — so not 100% of the population injected will react that way. This makes it even more sinister. It's unpredictable which people or animals when injected will go into the state of anaphylaxis.
Sasha Latypova, April 2025
…You can selectively breed animals and plants, and the same rules apply to microorganisms: with many lab tricks you can probably coax some new features out of them. Selective breeding has one rule however - you have to build secure fences to isolate your new breed from nature.
The BSL facilities are protecting the lab creations, not the people around them. If your prized new breed escapes into the wild and intermingles with the wild types, they quickly become what Nature intended — lunch or mates for the wild types, and thus only the wild types will continue as a going concern!
The “selectively bred” sequences do not change the laws of nature…”
Katherine Watt, correspondence, May 2025
...Many, many terms get thrown around — medical countermeasure, security countermeasure, qualified pandemic product, vaccine, gene therapy, chemical toxin...the lists are long1 and they add new terms and phrases all the time.
All of the terms fall under "biological products" on the public health/FDA/fake-regulation side, and "biological agents" on the military/biological-and-chemical-weapons-exempt-from-prohibitions side.
Classification of vaccines as biological and chemical weapons: physical and legal analyses
Questions of fact and law:
Can development, production, stockpiling and use of Covid-19 vaccines be categorized and prosecuted as violations of prohibitions on biological and chemical weapons under US laws implementing the UN Convention on Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and the UN Convention on Chemical Weapons?
Can development, production, stockpiling and use of all vaccines be categorized and prosecuted as violations of prohibitions on biological and chemical weapons under US laws implementing the UN Convention on Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and the UN Convention on Chemical Weapons?
My views:
By their physical composition and physiological effects on living humans and animals, vaccine mixtures in vials, hypodermic needles and syringes for injection, and vaccination acts by human beings can be classified as biological, bacteriological, toxin and chemical weapons and weapon delivery systems.
But under law, vaccines, needles, syringes and vaccination acts cannot be classified, prohibited or prosecuted as acts of production and use of biological, bacteriological, toxin and chemical weapons or weapon delivery systems.
Under US law, the legal exclusions and shields lie in intent- and purpose-based classifications of living biological micro-organisms and biologically-active substances produced by living or decaying micro-organisms, or synthetically manufactured to resemble naturally-produced organic chemical compounds.
Biological products as defined under 42 USC 262 and biological agents, toxins and toxic chemicals as defined under 18 USC 178, 18 USC 229, 22 USC 6701 and related laws, are the same dynamic (living, unstable), mixtures of physical things: living organisms and the products living organisms produce.
They cause the same physiological damage, varying from person to person (or animal to animal) depending on the forms the living organisms possess when injected, the composition of the mixture of organisms and organic and inorganic biochemical substances, idiosyncratic intrinsic factors and exposures across time, but predictably harmful at the population scale, manifest in the panoply of chronic diseases that have increased since the mid-20th century.
The only legally-relevant distinctions between prohibited "biological agents" and promoted "biological products" are the stated purposes or intents of promoters and handlers.
There are no objective physical criteria to distinguish between prohibited biological agents and promoted biological products, and there are no valid physical tests that can be used to completely or accurately identify container contents or physiological effects.
The criteria upon which legal distinctions are made are the intent- and purpose-based words stated by manufacturers and regulators, and printed on the container labels.
If the label bears the word "vaccine" or a synonym denoting a substance and delivery system "designed to be administered" for the prevention of diseases, then the biological agents and toxins inside the container, and the delivery systems (i.e., syringes) are set beyond the bounds of legal prohibition and the producers, regulators and users are set beyond the bounds of criminal prosecution.
The pretense of regulation for conformity with non-existent manufacturing standards — which, among other effects, legalizes adulteration and misbranding — is part of the "delivery system" for injected biological organisms, organic compounds and inorganic substances classified as biological agents excluded from prohibitions and criminal prosecutions.
Can Covid-19 vaccines, and all vaccines, be seen and understood as biological agents, chemical toxins and delivery systems that should be avoided for self-defense, family defense and national security reasons, because they are falsely classified as being for protective, defensive or peaceful purposes?
Yes.
Legal history as method for understanding
It can be useful to look at and understand the UN Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction (opened for signatures 1972, entered into force in 1975) and the UN Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction (opened for signatures 1993, entered into force in 1997), along with US federal implementation acts incorporated into biological product and communicable disease control laws (including 42 USC 262, 263 and 264 and 21 USC 360bbb) and “select agents and toxins” laws (including 42 USC 262a, enacted 2002 and 42 CFR 73, published in Federal Register in 2005) as theatrical props supporting projected illusions about threats.
The illusions of threats are projected in the same way that biological product statutes and regulations serve as theatrical props supporting false portrayal of vaccines — and all parenterally-administered organic biological material — as preventatives, prophylactics, defensive measures, therapeutics and treatments, when they are actually poisons intended to harm recipients
Stage sets and stage directions include "biosafety" level (BSL) high containment biological laboratories (HCBL); "biological select agents and toxins (BSAT), "gain-of-function" (GoF) and "dual-use" research programs; and restricted access policies surrounding such programs and facilities.
These programs, policies and facilities suggest to human imaginations that these facilities 1) contain determinate, stable substances that cause specific diseases; 2) that disease-causative agents are readily transmitted through casual contact (breathing, coughing, sneezing, sharing dishes and utensils, handshaking, hugging); 3) that transmission of disease-causative agents can cause widespread, deadly outbreaks; and 4) that infection and transmission can be prevented by vaccines.
None of those four things are true.
It's useful to understand that distinctions between biological agents, chemical agents and toxins are false and misleading. Many microorganisms are capable of reproduction, and all living biological organisms take up, use and excrete biologically-active chemical compounds (such as proteins) that in themselves may not reproduce, but are integral, inseparable, non-independent contributors to the living nature of living organisms and have the capacity, when injected into the blood of a living animal or human being for whom they are foreign or non-self, to elicit rejection responses that can weaken and kill the recipient creature.
It's useful to think of vaccines, gene therapies and biosimilars (and analogous biological products which go by many different names) as binary or two-step weapons systems. Enabling laws and their embedded exemptions and misleading labels comprise parts of the initial step: defeating the cognitive defenses of human targets by deceiving them into believing contents of containers are stable, specific (identifiable, pure, unmixed, uncontaminated, unadulterated) and capable of mitigating or protecting from disease.
Containers (vials), refrigeration, syringes, hypodermic needles and human vaccinators comprise parts of the second step: defeating physical defenses of human targets by preventing natural decomposition and harmless dispersal of biological matter, and by crossing barriers presented by skin, mucous membranes, and digestive tract.
Key to understanding deceptions derived from communicable disease and biological poison frauds is understanding why there are exemptions in the UN conventions and US federal laws for biological agents and chemical toxins claimed to be produced and used for purposes claimed to be defensive or peaceful.
Deceivers need people to believe two sets of lies: lies about threats against which defense or protection can be presented as necessary ("something is spreading") and lies about poisons which can be camouflaged as protection-from-threats.
Deceivers have made legal instruments to serve as theatrical props in support of both sets of projected illusions.
Related:
May 10, 2022 - Shell game
Sept. 18, 2022 - DOD chemical and biological warfare program: herd-culling plus stockpile disposal in one tidy package
April 25, 2024 - Terms, phrases and organizations involved in worldwide regulatory and manufacturing deception surrounding vaccines and other biological products.
Dec. 13, 2024 - There is no scientific definition of vaccine in US biological product law.
March 19, 2025 - On the absence of legal and scientific standards of evidence for public health emergency and emergency countermeasure determinations and declarations by HHS Secretary. "...There’s no legal requirement to produce any evidence to support the declaration that something exists, so there’s no evidentiary standard that an HHS secretary can be challenged for not having met..."
March 22, 2025 - Illusion that 'something is spreading' as one foundational pillar for the lie that vaccines are medical products intended for prevention of disease infection and transmission. - "...On the legal and military side, the roots lie in the 1902 virus-toxin law and the 1944 PHSA. On the science and medicine side, the roots lie in the falsification of bench science, medical diagnosis and statistical data starting with Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch, Paul Ehrlich and Rudolph Virchow, to enable the projection of illusions of communicable diseases as threats, which enable the projection of undefined and indefinable viruses, toxins, serums and vaccines as prophylactics and treatments for the illusory communicable diseases, and enable the projection of legal and military preparedness and responses as justifiable..."
Some terms and phrases used to denote or classify biological products in American and international legal instruments:
Allergen; allergenic product; analogous product; antigen; antitoxin; arsphenamine or derivative of arsphenamine (or any other trivalent organic arsenic compound); attenuated infectious vaccine; bacteria; biopharmaceutical; biosimilar; biosimilar biological product; biotechnology; biotechnology product; blood, blood component or derivative cell therapies; cells pulsed with immunogen; cellular therapy products; component of pathogen; conjugates; crude or purified antigens isolated from killed or living cells; crude or purified antigens secreted from living cells; diagnostic antigen; emerging technology in the context of the pharmaceutical and related industries; first interchangeable biosimilar biological product; fraction of pathogen; gene; gene therapies; genetically-modified organism (GMO); human blood and blood components; human cellular and gene therapy products; human somatic cell therapy and gene therapy; immunogen; immunotoxin; intentionally altered genomic DNA; living vectored cells expressing specific heterologous immunogens; microbial culture; microbial derived proteins; monoclonal antibody; parasite; pathogen; peptide; plasma-derived pharmaceutical; plasma-derived product; plasmid; plasmid DNA vaccine; polynucleotides; polypeptide; protein; recombinant nucleic acid molecules; recombinant or synthetic carbohydrate, protein or peptide antigens; recombinant protein; reference product; regenerative medicine therapies; regenerative medicine advanced therapy; somatic cell therapy; synthetic biological product; synthetic nucleic acid molecules; therapeutic biological product; therapeutic biotechnology; therapeutic biotechnology-derived biological product; therapeutic recombinant DNA-derived product; therapeutic serum; toxin; toxoid; vaccine; virus; well-characterized platform technology; well-characterized therapeutic recombinant DNA-derived and monoclonal antibody biotechnology products; whole, inactivated pathogen.