Another piece of the Russia-demonization and one-world-secular-technocratic-government puzzle
World Health Organization already is world government; Russia is the only nation-state whose government is resisting expansion of WHO powers.
Under current international and federal law, the mass murder campaign of the hospital/nursing home protocols and Covid-19 'vaccines,' that would formerly have fallen under pre-2005 international legal definitions of crimes against humanity, is entirely legal.
It's not just legal. It's mandatory for nation-states that are implementing signatories to the 2005 International Health Regulations, including the US government.
And the World Health Organization is currently attempting to expand and strengthen the 2005 IHR framework, using the temporary rollback of Covid-19 'mitigation' measures and the shock of the Ukraine-Russia conflict as pretext and smokescreen.
It’s plausible that the international bankers’ cabal fronted by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum politically maneuvered the timing of Ukraine’s attempt to join NATO to provoke Russia’s defensive response, for at least two classic shock-doctrine purposes:
delegitimizing and obscuring Russia’s resistance to one-world-secular-technocratic-government via World Health Organization digital-surveillance-based public health authoritarianism; and
creating a pretextual international emergency to grease the political skids in other countries, for more rapid betrayal of nation-state’s consent-based legal governing structures, and adoption of centralized power.
This is related to the international, federal, state and county legal systems that I posted about on Feb. 9 and Feb. 26:
Feb. 9 - World Health Organization now working toward an expansion of the 2005 International Health Regulations
Feb. 26 - Legal Walls of the Covid-19 Kill Box; PDF version (25 pp., includes footnotes)
Below is information from Swiss researcher and former World Health Organization employee Astrid Stuckelberger via The Great Reject, slightly edited for clarity; the original accounts of Stuckelberger’s reports appear to have been written by people for whom English is not their first language.
WHO is World Government. Power grab scheduled for May 1, 2022. With “relaxations” you are being framed.
The fact that they are suddenly distancing themselves from restrictions is just a game.
The last week of January 2022, the World Health Organization held an emergency meeting and deliberations in Geneva on expanding its powers to take over all member-states in the event of a pandemic and “any other form of threat or disaster.”
WHO wants member states to sign a new treaty on Covid-19, which expands the 2005 treaty [International Health Regulations].
Once signed by the Ministers of Health, the WHO Constitution (according to Article 19) takes precedence over any country’s [federal] constitution (189 countries have signed the 2005 treaty) during natural disasters or pandemics.
Since the definition of pandemic was changed a few years ago (cases based on the PCR test), they can enforce obedience in any country and impose WHO guidelines on the public, which will be mandatory, not just recommended. And that sounds like power over the country and the world.
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, who has worked for the WHO for 20 years, warns that every country should send a public letter of protest to the WHO.
Governments should draft a letter stating that the people do not accept that the signature of the Minister of Health can decide the fate of millions of people without a referendum.
It is very important to send this letter from every country to the WHO in Geneva. WHO wants all countries to implement the measures by May 2022.
Dr. Stuckelberger shared the information that so far, only the Russians have sent such a rejection letter!
More information via Stuckelberger’s Telegram:
The most dangerous articles of the WHO CONSTITUTION for our liberties are
1) Article 19, which states that if two-thirds of member states accept a resolution or new regulation under “emergency law,” it is adopted for ALL member states with a time of implementation (under Article 22); and
2) Articles 20 & 21, which states that any regulation can be put in place for global health security, including:
sanitary and quarantine measures (i.e. lockdown, masks, isolation and distancing at random)
nomenclatura change (i.e. definitions)
standardization of diagnostics (i.e. tech replacing doctors with fraud like PCR)
standardized procedures and products
labelling and marketing of products (e.g. the business is on! Vaccines Forever)
React before it is too late!
It is a right of member states to object and refuse participation, in Article 20, but most federal governments will not use it, so individual citizens should use it.
Anyone can write to WHO as a citizen of the world and of his or her country.
Write a letter with a copy to the UN Secretary General, your own government and your country’s ministry of health, to state:
that as People of the country they are supposed to inform you of the proposed international law and represent you for your best interests;
that you do not consent in any way to this treaty or any form of agreement under a ‘public health emergency of international concern’ (PHEIC) or other international emergency;
that you do not consent that your government [to the extent your government is complicit] represents you;
you oppose all decisions from now on and those taken in the past which need serious revision under the supervision of the People; and
any other points you want to add
Sign alone, in groups or on behalf of an organization.
Send copies to:
WHO Director General
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
20 Avenue Appia
1211 GENEVA 27
Secretary-General of the United Nations
405 East 42nd Street,
New York, NY, 10017, USA
Your Country’s President (Prime Minister, etc.)
Your Country’s Minister of Health (Secretary of Health and Human Services, etc.)
International Coronavirus Investigative Committee led by Reiner Fuellmich.
Distribute copies on your platforms and to your networks.
One more step towards freedom, out of disease and perpetual vaccination tyranny!
NOTE: It’s not clear why Stuckelberger cites the date of the power grab’s completion as May 1, 2022, because a March 3, 2022 press release by the European Council states:
Council gives green light to start negotiations on international pandemic treaty
On 3 March 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorise the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
The intergovernmental negotiating body, tasked with drafting and negotiating this international instrument, will hold its next meeting by 1 August 2022, to discuss progress on a working draft. It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.
However, Stuckelberger cites to Article 19 of the WHO Constitution, which holds that if two-thirds of signatory nations adopt a resolution or regulation under an “emergency,” it becomes binding on all signatory nations.
This is why it’s plausible that the European Council press release is a smokescreen. By provoking the war between Ukraine and Russia, the one-world-secular-technocracy team is attempting to create the “emergency” pretext to implement full global authoritarianism by May 1, 2022.
Last thought for now:
What goes up must come down. Even if the international bankers’ obtain their centralized secular technocratic surveillance-and-control authority over global populations in the short-term, they will not retain their dominance forever.
Deus vicit. God conquers.
Still, I’d rather they don’t get the control in the short term, or ever.
I’d rather see them stopped, tried and convicted for their crimes, under the pre-2005 international legal system, while the rest of us try to recover and govern our communities in decentralized, informed-consent-based structures that uphold God’s laws through faith, hope and charity.
Russia isnt resisting anything. The Sberbank has been implementing WEF initiatives since 2008.
And guess who owns 50% of Sberbank shares?
So you may want to edit your subtitle for the article.
Overwhelming information. Thought the science was complicated! My own boundaries stop at the ethical and medical edges and get bogged down in the legal swamp. I will depend on others to explain the legal and governmental web in which we are ensnared. Where's Thomas Paine when we all could use his help?