2004 Project Bioshield Act amendments to 1938 Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act attempted to legally void Nuremberg principles, through redefinitions.
Attorney Todd Callender was on Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet’s Truth for Health podcast this past weekend, discussing the 10th Circuit US Court of Appeals appellate brief (22-1032) Callender’s team recently filed in Robert v. Austin, 21-cv-2228 (USDC Colorado) in which military members are challenging Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s purported ‘vaccine mandate.’
Callender and Lee discussed the US government’s violations of informed consent principles, rendering the entire vaccine program inflicted on military members and civilians alike — a genocide and a war crime identical in character, but far more massive in scale than the Nazi war crimes that led to the Nuremberg trials.
In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been tracking down and reading through some of the many relevant Congressional acts passed since 9/11 and the subsequent anthrax bioterrorism, including:
1938 Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act
1944 Public Health Service Act (consolidated and streamlined public health law and administration, further militarized and broadened scope of Public Health Service functions as previously authorized by Congress in 1878, 1889, 1890, 1893 and 1906)
1983 Public Health Service Act Amendment (added new Section 319, “Public Health Emergencies,” and established $30 million Public Health Emergency Fund)
1986 Childhood Vaccine Compensation Act (exempted pharmaceutical product manufacturers from tort liability for injury and death, established federal taxpayer-funded compensation scheme)
1988 Health Omnibus Programs Act (increased Public Health Emergency Fund to $45 million)
1992 Preventative Health Amendments (changed name of Centers for Disease Control to Center for Disease Control and Prevention)
2000 Public Health Improvement Act (expanded authorities granted to Secretary of Health and Human Services under Section 319, Public Health Emergencies)
2002 Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act
2002 Homeland Security Act
2004 Project Bioshield Act
2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act
2006 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act
2007 John Warner Defense Authorization Act (amended 10 USC 333 re: “insurrection.”)
2012 National Defense Authorization Act (authorized indefinite detention of US citizens without charge or trial)
2013 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act
2016 21st Century Cures Act
2019 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act
2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
The shots are classified as Emergency Use Authorization “countermeasures,” under the Project Bioshield Act of 2004 amendments to the 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act and the 1944 Public Health Service Act.
This means that under 21 USC 360bbb-3(k), they are by Congress's legal definition, not part of any “clinical investigation,” despite the fact that the Phase 3 clinical trials will not be finished for two years at the earliest.
“(k) Relation to other provisions - If a product is the subject of an authorization under this section, the use of such product within the scope of the authorization shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation for purposes of section 355(i), 360b(j), or 360j(g) of this title or any other provision of this chapter or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262].”
It’s relevant to the legal arguments in many human courts about how employers and governments have persuaded themselves that they can ‘mandate’ shots, without running afoul of the Nuremberg Code, the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 USC 1107), 45 CFR 46.116 (Public Welfare) and 21 CFR 50.25 (Food and Drug Administration) provisions requiring the informed consent of human subjects in medical experiments free from duress or coercion.
Combined with Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital June 12, 2021 ruling from the Southern District of Texas, and a legal opinion issued by Deputy Attorney General Dawn Johnsen on July 6, 2021, these unlawful, unjust laws comprise legislative, regulatory and judicial nullification of informed consent principles for US citizens.
The Bridges case is currently on appeal in Fifth Circuit - plaintiff brief filed in November 2021, hospital brief filed in late January 2022.
There’s a lot more to learn about the comprehensive, premeditated nature of the ongoing war crimes from line-by-line reading and cross-referencing of the statutes and the implementing regulations adopted by Congress and carried out by the Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense and other federal agencies between 2001 and today.
Break these unlawful, immoral human laws, at every opportunity you have.